Comments on: The BROADSHEET Newsletter Autumn 2009

By: Yvonne Lanelli

Yvonne Lanelli — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:54:18 +0000

I remember this discussion several years ago, and the word “media” sparked controversy because of a particular national radio talk personality who used the word “media” most pejoratively. I find it interesting that this is no longer of concern. Does he no longer speak ill of “media” or have we gone beyond innuendo? I’ll vote for either new name, given that “Press” doesn’t apply to electronic, TV or radio; and that we “women” now include men.

By: Tania Casselle

Tania Casselle — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:20:21 +0000

The ‘women’ part of the name IS anachronistic, and doesn’t represent the full membership. I prefer NM Media Professionals over NM Media Network, but the looseness of ‘media’ jars, as any old bod can throw up a blog and call themselves ‘media’. Traditional/established media practices and solid reporting are already so undermined by writer mills and social media. Old fashioned as it is, I like the word Press in the name – it implies some standards, both for the journalists and for PR professionals working with journos. More in keeping with the umbrella organization, what about New Mexico Press Federation?

By: Connie Gotsch

Connie Gotsch — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:14:09 +0000

I Could go with New Mexico Media Professionals or New Mexico media Network

By: Bud Russo, Treasurer LCPW

Bud Russo, Treasurer LCPW — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:58:17 +0000

I found NFPW conference of great value. Lots of ideas. Lots of encouragement. Lots of new friends. If you’ve never been, think Chicago. I plan to be there if at all possible.

By: Bud Russo, Treasurer LCPW

Bud Russo, Treasurer LCPW — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:56:38 +0000

Regarding a name change. Times have changed. Women are well represented in the media — although I suspect they’re still not paid the same a men. The media is changing … rapidly. But journalism will thrive in the new environment. I’m all in favor of NM Media Professionals.